MODEL INTRODUCTION
English Unit 3 · Assessment Exemplar
How can a strong proposal convince the principal?
How can we ask the principal clearly?
DO Ask students to predict two questions the principal would ask before approving the proposal.
WORK Explain that the lesson studies how a model writer earns agreement; it is not a class vote about pets.
RECORD Students write: audience = principal; action = approve one planned Pet Learning Day.
FINISH When students can name the audience and exact action.
CHECK Listen for safety and animal-welfare questions, not only excitement.
MODEL INTRODUCTION
MINI-WHITEBOARDS FIRST
Look for the sentence that names the audience's decision: should allow.
DO Read the whole introduction once before analysing it. Collect all-student choices on mini-whiteboards.
WORK Students decide which highlighted section states the proposal and justify with its modal verb.
RECORD Hook + opinion + preview.
FINISH When students explain why the stance, not the hook, contains the decision.
CHECK Misconception: the most exciting sentence is automatically the opinion.
REASON 1 · RESPONSIBILITY
CHOOSE, THEN EXPLAIN
A strong supporting detail tells us where the information came from.
DO Contrast the bare claim “Pets teach responsibility” with the complete evidence chain.
WORK Students identify the named source and explain what it proves: schools can plan animal learning responsibly.
RECORD Reason → supporting detail → explanation.
FINISH When students can say that the source supports responsible planning, not a promise that every student will improve.
CHECK Misconception: a named source automatically proves every claim in the paragraph.
REASON 2 · MEMORABLE LEARNING
BUILD THE EXPLANATION
Start with the action students do. Finish with the learning result.
DO Ask students to predict the causal order aloud before touching the screen.
WORK Select the three cards in order, then join them orally with because, so and this means.
RECORD One complete explanation chain.
FINISH When students can explain the middle step rather than jumping from pet attendance straight to learning.
CHECK Misconception: an enjoyable activity automatically produces learning without a teaching action.
The best response respects the concern and gives the principal rules that can be checked.
DO Have students vote before selecting. Require: “The plan is strongest because…”
WORK Test each response against three criteria: respects the concern, protects people, protects animals.
RECORD Concern + however + workable rule.
FINISH When students reject both dismissal and total surrender.
CHECK The official boundary is stricter than “bring any pet”: approval, risk planning and supervision are essential.
A strong call to action is specific: approve one safe trial day.
DO Read the conclusion without labels. Ask students to name each sentence's job before revealing.
WORK Reveal restatement, summary and action in order.
RECORD Students draft a precise call to action for their own audience.
FINISH When calls to action name an audience decision, not only “help now”.
CHECK Ask: Could the principal tell exactly what to approve?
Principal: approve one planned Pet Learning Day.
Imagine calm, approved pets ready for learning.
Responsibility + official animal-welfare guidance.
Observe → explain → ask → learn.
Allergies and safety + approval, handler, hygiene, no-contact option.
Restate, summarise and request one trial day.
DO Trace the plan from audience decision to call to action.
WORK Students fill the six matching spaces for their negotiated assessment topic.
RECORD One note in every planning section; sentences are not required yet.
FINISH When each reason has a supporting detail or explanation.
CHECK Conference first with students who have reasons but no audience action.
[LOOK AT THE PRINCIPAL · WARM TONE]
Imagine walking into school and seeing calm, approved pets ready for learning.
[PAUSE · FIRM VOICE · EMPHASISE THE REQUEST]
Our principal should allow one carefully planned Pet Learning Day.
[SLOW DOWN]
With clear rules, we can protect people and pets.
Speaker: make two voice choices.
Listener: “Your clearest moment was…”
Revise: change one cue or one sentence.
DO Model the excerpt once in a flat voice and once using the cues.
WORK Pairs rehearse for 45 seconds and give one precise response.
RECORD Students annotate one section of their own draft with two voice choices.
FINISH After one immediate revision and second attempt.
CHECK Voice choices should clarify meaning, not become shouting or performance effects without purpose.
□ Clear audience and opinion
□ Hook and reason preview
□ Two reasons with supporting details
□ Fair concern and workable response
□ Specific call to action
□ Use writing as a guide, not a script
□ Look at the audience
□ Pause at an important moment
□ Change pace, tone or volume for meaning
□ Rehearse, receive feedback and revise
EXIT: Improve this bare claim: “Pets at school would be good.” Add a reason, a supporting detail or a workable rule.
EXIT: Make this stronger: “Pets at school would be good because…”
DO Use the checklist to review the completed planning map and spoken annotation.
WORK Students complete the exit improvement independently.
RECORD Collect the exit sentence.
FINISH When the improved claim contains a reason, relevant detail or audience-aware rule.
CHECK Sort exits into: opinion only; reason added; supported and audience-aware.
Select a slide to see accompanying pedagogical notes and teaching tips.